Throughout human history, wars have taken countless lives , and have devoted many wonderful cities destroyed . But despite the long list of conflicts from ancient times to modern day psychologists say that war is not inevitable .
Many researchers have focused on the causes of war and its consequences . But three political psychologists Amherst University in Massachusetts say that understanding the causes of war is the best way to prevent and resolve conflicts .
Bernhard Leidner , Linda and Brian Lickel tropp presented their views in an article in the journal American Psychologist , VOA broadcasts . Leidner is its main author .
" When it comes to war , most psychologists focus on human tendencies as aggressive and violent acts . The focus is more on the negative side of it , but not so much how to prevent it . "
He says studies show that those who " praise the roof of their countries " , a kind of nationalism that , there are more likely to resort to violence , but those who serve the country in a better way show no such trend .
But how can anyone be taught " in extreme praises " his place ? Leidner says that this should be done several questions like these .
" How is your country superior to others ? This is one aspect . Practically they think their country is the most moral , better and more successful in every aspect . As criticism allowed in your country ? People think that criticism shows a lack of loyalty to country , so expect a kind of unconditional loyalty " .
The study authors say that conflict and violence create possibilities to meet people " their psychological needs for identity , security and power ." Nonviolent actions have attracted much less media attention .
Leidner researcher says that it is important for political leaders to explain that there may be other ways to resolve the crisis , the conflict on the one hand and on the other hand diplomacy . He says surveys show that diplomacy is preferable to violence , when the question involves both , rather than the question of whether or not favored attack .
" There are examples of Nelson Mandela in South Africa , whose rhetoric trend showed cooperation . He changed step by step views of the citizens of his country that it is better to cooperate and live in peace with others . "
Mr Mandela said that " if we make peace with the enemy , you have to work with the enemy . Then he becomes your partner . "
Mr. Leidner compares this with the rhetoric in the United States after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 . He says she became bitter against American Muslims over time .
Leidner and co-authors of the study say that leaders should emphasize understanding with others . They write that " are convinced that psychology can and should exercise to promote peace and not war .
Many researchers have focused on the causes of war and its consequences . But three political psychologists Amherst University in Massachusetts say that understanding the causes of war is the best way to prevent and resolve conflicts .
Bernhard Leidner , Linda and Brian Lickel tropp presented their views in an article in the journal American Psychologist , VOA broadcasts . Leidner is its main author .
" When it comes to war , most psychologists focus on human tendencies as aggressive and violent acts . The focus is more on the negative side of it , but not so much how to prevent it . "
He says studies show that those who " praise the roof of their countries " , a kind of nationalism that , there are more likely to resort to violence , but those who serve the country in a better way show no such trend .
But how can anyone be taught " in extreme praises " his place ? Leidner says that this should be done several questions like these .
" How is your country superior to others ? This is one aspect . Practically they think their country is the most moral , better and more successful in every aspect . As criticism allowed in your country ? People think that criticism shows a lack of loyalty to country , so expect a kind of unconditional loyalty " .
The study authors say that conflict and violence create possibilities to meet people " their psychological needs for identity , security and power ." Nonviolent actions have attracted much less media attention .
Leidner researcher says that it is important for political leaders to explain that there may be other ways to resolve the crisis , the conflict on the one hand and on the other hand diplomacy . He says surveys show that diplomacy is preferable to violence , when the question involves both , rather than the question of whether or not favored attack .
" There are examples of Nelson Mandela in South Africa , whose rhetoric trend showed cooperation . He changed step by step views of the citizens of his country that it is better to cooperate and live in peace with others . "
Mr Mandela said that " if we make peace with the enemy , you have to work with the enemy . Then he becomes your partner . "
Mr. Leidner compares this with the rhetoric in the United States after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 . He says she became bitter against American Muslims over time .
Leidner and co-authors of the study say that leaders should emphasize understanding with others . They write that " are convinced that psychology can and should exercise to promote peace and not war .
